Don't Miss the Forest for the Trees
Is it possible we’re looking at Christianity
too closely? There is no end of debates between denominations over What
specifically makes one a Christian. It’s a fair question, with very few
opinions agreeing. Perhaps we’re looking at the details and missing the image.
I know I’ve personally spent a great deal of time trying to figure out the
timing of events, the perceived boundaries between law and grace, and trying to
determine actions that are Christ-like. Something seems to be jumping out to me
of late that upends all of those questions.
I have been spending some time attempting to
disconnect myself from conceptual baggage that I’ve accumulated of the years. I’ve
realized there is much more of it than I thought. Trying to study Christianity is
a lot like putting a puzzle together. Now, imagine you have this puzzle, but
you also have an image of what you THINK the puzzle is.. That’s what I’m trying
to ignore, what I think I know.
For the purpose of this article, I want to
look at the Bible, as we know it, as a narrative, or a story. That DOES NOT
mean I’m reducing the bible to just a story, far from it. What I’m intending to
do is ADD a perspective of what I consider important and fundamental text.
Emergence of the Ideal -
In my studies I seem to always come to the
same conclusion about the nature of a Christian. From the Patriarchs in Genesis
with their novel commands and statutes given directly by God to each man, to
the nation of Israel with novel statutes and laws given by God and administered
by man, to the fulfillment of those symbols by Christ Himself, to the
instructions of the New Testament writers who insist on the internal nature of
laws, they all point to the same thing in my mind. The Nature of a Christian is
one of pursuing the Ideal. (Ideal – noun, a person or thing regarded as
perfect.)
The process of becoming a perfect thing. In
this case, God. From the very beginning as recorded, man is made, or formed in
the image of God. Man is NOT God at creation, but is in the image of God. Man's
existence in the image of God at creation is also correlated to Animals and their
purpose to replicate themselves after their kind.
The Patriarchs like Noah, Abraham, Isaac,
and so on, are given novel directives. God gives them specific instructions,
and they are to carry them out. These commands aren't, as far as it is
recorded, given in a framework of organized religion. They are plain and
simple, unusual or novel directives. As we read about each of these people and
their stories, we find an acting out of a 'piece' of the character of God. Not
a big piece, but fundamental aspect of the nature of God. For instance;
The account of Noah early on in the history
of mankind, lays out an architype of a worthy savior. The idea that there IS an
entity that is capable of saving. There are no shortage of Christ-like concepts
imbedded in the story, but I don’t want to get bogged down in details. I want
to scan the scriptures at low resolution to see if there’s a forest around all
of these trees.
Then there’s Abraham opening his eyes, and
being aware, we start to see the Godly-man architype emerge. In his case, he
was made aware of a choice, he had wealth, and opportunity already, but
illumination came in the form of God offering something better. The story tells
us how he Chose his path, and the story makes him the hero for his Choices.
Abraham is a conscious man, not just following life as it happens. He was actively
navigating life.
Later the story of Jacob introduces new
characters and new concepts not previously seen. Jacob's name is changed to
Israel, or 'he who wrestles with god', not just depicting a specific bout, but
even deeper the concept of endeavoring. Jacob's story is more or less about a
man who seeks, searches, tests, proves and pursues goal. Jacob doesn’t accept
the promises to him blindly. He also struggles with God, not only in a
wrestling match, but with the idea of God leading him.
By this early point in the narrative, just
the book of Genesis, we have an ideal. There is a goal that has emerged. It
might not be defined well, but the shape is visible. It's something like;
1. Man was designed to look like God and to
replicate himself in God's image. (creation)
2. Salvation being necessary, because man
is not yet God, it's a good thing to be worthy to fill that need. (Noah)
3. When confronted with life, and
specifically truth, it is a good thing to acknowledge it and consciously
navigate it. (Abraham)
4. The heroic way of conducting oneself is
to contend with purpose and take your prospects serious enough to expend your
energy pursuing them. (Jacob)
That's obviously not an exhaustive list of
the attributes of the ideal found in Genesis, and it's also my personal
interpretation, but nonetheless I think it's fair to say there is an ideal, or
a goal emerging in the story. That, in my mind ends the first chapter, or time
period.
Offering of the Ideal -
The next time period we come to, seems to
me like a whole new chapter, that is the Nation of Israel. The interaction
between God and Man changes here. There are reasons for that change, and while
those reasons are important I'm going to focus on the progression of the
narrative, rather than the details at this point. The main thing here, is that
The Ideal (the perfection of the patriarchs and God’s satisfaction with them)
is offered to a group of people. This group of people is given, because of the
promises of God to their ancestors, a chance to be redeemed from their sins. They
did not act like their righteous ancestors, but God offered them an
olive-branch in the form of codifying the requirements of the Ideal.
From creation to the time of Moses, there was
one-on-one interaction between God and man, and the commands and instruction
given were very simple monochromatic concepts. When we get to the time of Moses
things become more complex. If we take the ideal that emerged from the first
section, and let this next time period build on to it as the same project, we’ll
find that this new set of directives adds detail to the Ideal.
The Mosaic Law, at a very basic level,
describes what righteousness looks like in physical terms. Interestingly at the
same time that God is explaining what physical righteousness would look like,
He is lamenting the fact that He is having to explain it in the first place because
people are refusing to internalize His instruction. From the very inception of
the mosaic law God explains that the physical keeping of that law is to
illuminate the spiritual truth of it. It's a map, a map of how to act, more
specifically, it's a picture of what a person would act like, if they were
internally righteous. During this time period of the physical Nation of Israel,
we need to remember that God repeatedly sent prophets to proclaim to the people
that God was NOT satisfied with their sacrifices, and offerings, and Sabbaths,
and new moons, etc because those things were supposed to teach them to act
righteously. Instead, the nation turned the law into a checklist and never
internalized the concepts.
So let's take our ideal and add some of
these details, remember, we are scanning at low-resolution;
5. Sanctification is required to progress
towards the Ideal. (Levitical law)
6. Sacrifice is required to progress
towards the Ideal. (Levitical law)
7. It is a requirement to Love God and to
have a singular focus in becoming more like Him. (1-4 commandments)
8. Love for mankind is required to be a
Godly-man. (5-10 commandments)
These details and requirements help define The
Ideal. Remember the Apostle Paul said, these specific things were recorded for
our sake. From here in Exodus to Malachi it is a collection of recordings about
people living their live with the knowledge of The Ideal. Some stories detail
those who pursue it and attain it in some measure like David, Solomon, Samuel, as
well as numerous prophecies and references to One who will fulfil all things.
The rest, and the majority it seems, of the stories go into details about the price
of ignoring or not pursuing The Ideal.
Christ, the Fulfilment of the Ideal
-
The third time period starts with Jesus Christ.
Jesus starts His earthly ministry with several actions and statements to prove who
He is. He then, leads a physical life of service. Constantly teaching the correlation
between the mosaic law and the spiritual law. He teaches repentance and belief,
while serving people in physical ways. Then He is killed, fulfilling The Ideal.
He acted out the whole thing, and made the idea of what a righteous man would
look like come to life. He Embodied the Ideal.
There is much more to the story obviously, but
remember, this is a low resolution scan. We are not looking at details we are
looking to see if the whole thing together has a pattern.
This third chapter or time period shows the whole
process. Christ embodied the Ideal described in the Patriarchs, being in God’s
image, being a worthy sacrifice, consciously navigating, and being heroic in perseverance
of the goal. He also fulfilled the requirements of Sanctification, Sacrifice, Singular
love for God, and Love for Mankind. He did the thing.
Most importantly (to the narrative we’re following),
He Set us an example.
Christ embodying the
Father:
Hebrews 5:7
John 14:9-11
Hebrews 12:1-13
Go ye and Do Likewise – Embody The
Ideal
The next part of the story, is one that has
caused a lot of trouble. The New Testament is a collection of documents written
by ordinary men who either were directly trained by, talked with, handled, or
knew Jesus. It is a testimony of men who were there. They recorded Jesus’ words
and deeds and actions, and then gave their sense as to how one could follow
Him. What was the consensus? Embody Him. That is, to take the things He did,
the words He spoke, the message He preached, and make it come to life in us. These
concepts of ‘feed on Christ’, ‘Clothe yourself with Christ’,’take, eat, this is
my body’, are not about cannibalism. They’re about making Christ’s actions come
alive in you. Galatians 2:20, is not a passive belief that you are saved, it’s
an active life of being Christ-like.
An example to Embody:
Romans 13:14
Ephesians 4:13
Mark 16:15-20
Romans 8
John 12:26
Matthew 10:38
John 13:15
1 Peter 2:21
John 15:9
During this time immediately following Christ’s
resurrection, mankind is given the Holy Spirit to help in this endeavor. The
purpose of the Spirit is to recall to mind all the things our savior did and
said, so that we can act them out.
The Bible as we know it is a narrative about
becoming God. It has the reasons why the ideal exists, the description of the
ideal, an example of the ideal being achieved and the tools and directions to
achieve it yourself. The entire concept of Christianity is in name. A Christian, is one who is of Christ.
-SF
What I am trying to understand with your blog posts, is that you are either trying to justify your stance in leaving the Church, or you are desperately trying to keep the understanding you grew up learning. You are treading a slippery slope. I too was once a part of LCG and know that that was not the place where God is working through. I agree that there are men out there that are not of God and want to be in the position of a "god-like" being with the improper government structure. However, there are organizations that are not like LCG, PCG, RCG, COG-assembly and others that do show love from the top. I can tell that you are conflicted and struggling to hold onto something that you are not 100% sure of. This is where I have seen many many people be pulled out of the Church throughout the years. It is only a matter of time. You can be a loving, giving, helpful person to those in the world, but...yes there is a but, you can only do so much without the support of the brethren in these end times (because you will be eaten up by the power that rules the world). The Church is an organism (a whole with independent parts), not an organization. It is made up of Christ as the head...not men. So, to go from one organization LCG, to another COG-Assembly that is ran by men that want to be gods, is not showing you or your family what a truly loving leader is, that reflects the nature of God. Those are bad examples, that yes...will leave a bad taste in one's mouth.
ReplyDeleteI'm not entirely sure how to process that comment, because it appears to be saying more than one thing.
ReplyDeleteBut, for the sake of discussion with an anonymous person,
1. I am not attempting to justify leaving LCG.
2. I am attempting to locate what was true in my upbringing. On that part you are partially correct.
(I'm numbering these not to be combative, but just to keep my thoughts separated btw)
3. I'm unsure of your intention in the sentences about there being other churches not like LCG, I cannot distinguish from the Grammer if you are saying the churches besides LCG are different, or that there are different churches besides all of them.
4. As for going from LCG to COGA, you seem to say that's what I did. For the record I did not, nor have I ever been a part of COGA, and have been vocal about my reasoning. I have attended with them a little in the early months, because I wanted to see what was going to happen, but there was something brewing there from the 1st feast that was too familiar.
Feel free to respond, I have a few hours free today.